<https://materializedview.io/p/mcp-server-could-ha...
# resources
d
https://materializedview.io/p/mcp-server-could-have-been-json-file ๐Ÿค” Edit: Oops, this should have been in #C03QF15L1K9, but I can't delete it now. facepalming
๐Ÿ‘ 2
i
I can use this as a #C03QPDQTLBG don't worry! Agree on the content though. Earlier this year I was pulling my hair out with the amount of questions I was getting on MCP and A2A ๐Ÿ‘€
a
"This Thread On #C03QPDQTLBG Could Have Been On #C03QF15L1K9!" ๐Ÿ˜„
๐Ÿ˜ 2
d
It felt too opinionated to be a resource. ๐Ÿ˜… But it does seem like a pretty valid and well-researched opinion.
a
tbh I've had a very similar take when it has comes to thinks like langchain etc ... seems like so much tooling is just reinventing wheels
d
The mcp spec does allow some clever things like the terribly named โ€˜samplingโ€™ which allows the tools you use to leverage an LLM api you pass through. You need a server for that, but most out there donโ€™t implement it. As always Chris is broadly on the money. Also the S in MCP stands for security
๐Ÿ‘ 1