@Luis Chaves Rodriguez In short, there's no reason why Kedro can't integrate very well with Dagster. Conceptually, it maps very cleanly, much like dbt or SQLMesh. Very excited about
@Guillaume Tauzinβs work.
From a Dagster internal perspective, there's so far been limited interest (or, probably more accurately, awareness), I think largely because there aren't any paying customers who have asked for it (and also relatively few OSS users so far). Hopefully there will be more interest over timeβI've moved to the team within Dagster that works more on integrations, and it may also be more relevant when we try to expand to more dedicated ML workflow support.
For what it's worth, I think the Kedro-Dagster integration
should be much better than the Kedro-Airflow integration once ready for use, just comparing the approaches. Kedro-Airflow follows a fairly naive/generic orchestrator mapping approach (the same as
https://docs.kedro.org/en/stable/deployment/prefect.html and many of the other deployment guides), whereas Kedro-Dagster translates each piece to Dagster-native concepts. This means Dagster has a lot greater understanding of what you're doing in your Kedro pipeline, whereas most of the current orchestrator integrations treat groups of nodes essentially as black boxes to execute.