Iñigo Hidalgo06/06/2023, 7:40 AM
? In this issue it was mentioned as a possibility but was discarded because it’s too “heavy” but I think adding one additional branch to the already-existing pandas check could be worth it for incorporating Ibis functionality.
Antony Milne06/06/2023, 10:02 PM
and somehow making the whole thing lighter). My objection on the issue you linked to I think was that it would have just been a temporary thing for LightGBM and we didn’t want to put in lots of special cases. But this ibis case sounds like one that is not a temporary workaround but the “correct” way to do it. So as far as I’m concerned, go for it!
Iñigo Hidalgo06/07/2023, 7:00 AM
Juan Luis06/07/2023, 7:32 AM
Iñigo Hidalgo06/07/2023, 7:43 AM
Antony Milne06/07/2023, 9:31 AM